Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stan Round

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 20:10, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stan Round[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not satisfy WP:N or WP:NSPORTS. Played for Burton Albion in the 1960s, when they were a non-league club. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 13:09, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The one verifiable fact seems better located in Burton Albion, in light of ISBN 9781848764477 pp. 55. The reliability of this potential source needs investigation. Uncle G (talk) 13:39, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It basically confirms that he was a Wolves reserve team player who only played in non-league football. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 13:45, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - It provides more biographical information than that alone. Uncle G (talk) 13:48, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 14:08, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 14:11, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete obscure, non-notable player. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:34, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:ATHLETE, a non-notable player. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 17:01, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as he fails both WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. --Carioca (talk) 19:11, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.