Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stan Eegit Lampard (SEL)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, speedy via G10 as a likely attack page. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 16:41, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stan Eegit Lampard (SEL)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

First it was a character in a childrens' book now supposedly of a Punjabi folk tale. No hits on Google. Has the strong smell of a hoax and/or possible attack page (assuming "Stan Eegit Lampard" is a real person) Travelbird (talk) 13:57, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete. A greenhouse in 1800? Though Robert Hooke discovered the "basic functional unit of all known living organisms," the final theory wasn't clarified until the mid 1800's. And we're supposed to believe this is part of a Punjabi folktale from 1800? Obvious hoax. --Quartermaster (talk) 14:05, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You my sir are racist! I have been told this tale at a young age and my parents knew of it and theirs before them. If you know nothing of Punjab then don't write about it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by J3wman (talk • contribs)

Now calm down and try to avoid insults. For starters, I meant "a time traveling greenhouse ..." as stated in the article, not just a greenhouse. Where does "racism" come into discussing this article? If you call me "ignorant" I might buy that (ignorance is a state we all fall into signifying a lack of knowledge, not stupidity) but "racist?" I do contest that epithet. This article might very well NOT be a hoax, so please discuss the merits by citing authoritative third party sources that support this rather than cast unfounded insults, especially if you are an expert in Punjabi folklore. I have no problem being enlightened and changing my viewpoint. --Quartermaster (talk) 16:28, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Refer to the newly added list of "Other Hobbies". I'm not going to post what is listed there because this discussion page will be preserved, but my concerns re the possibility of this being an attack page are becoming stronger. If this really isn't a hoax/attack page, then we need good sources asap. Subsequent edits are making this seem more and more like a case of speedy delete as obvious hoax/attack page. Travelbird (talk) 16:35, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment further After checking the users edit history I found I found this edit which makes it highly probable that this is an attack on a person. I have thus blanked the page and tagged it for speedy deletion. Travelbird (talk) 16:38, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.