Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stairway to Fairyland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Freedom Call#Discography. J04n(talk page) 14:33, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stairway to Fairyland[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems to be an entirely non-notable recording; when I came across it as a new pags reviewer I changed it to a redirect to the band. This has been undone a couple of times (and redone by another editor)... seeking a broader consensus. TheLongTone (talk) 14:35, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Its a non notable recording and as this is now an edit battleground by POV pushers it should be deleted.Slatersteven (talk) 14:41, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You had left a note on my talk page, suggesting to improve this article, which is exactly what I've started to do. Would you kindly explain what do you imply by "POV pushing", exactly? СССР (talk) 15:07, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I mean the POV that this is a notable album. At the time the note was left this article was very poorly sourced, it is not just poorly sourced.Slatersteven (talk) 18:34, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 14:57, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 14:57, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – the article has been expanded and referenced just prior to this nomination. СССР (talk) 15:02, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 15:10, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The expansion is irrelevant; the sources niche. Putting it kindly.TheLongTone (talk) 15:35, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Freedom Call and protect the redirect. The sources listed in the article are not suitable for establishing notability. I would also be okay with "Delete & redirect". K.e.coffman (talk) 02:53, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:33, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: When commenting please stay on topic, cite policy and or guidelines where ;possible and be brief.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 04:19, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - plausible search term, and sources can confirm its existence/name at least, but there's not enough here to establish notability. Most sources added to article are obscure music blogs or already classified as unreliable. (Like Sputnik Music user written reviews, which violate WP:USERG, per WP:MUSIC/SOURCES.) Sergecross73 msg me 17:34, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.