Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stages of Intimate Relationships

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No consensus. Deathphoenix ʕ 15:55, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stages of Intimate Relationships[edit]

Seems to be an original research work of some sort. It's also the only edit made by the article creator, for what that's worth. cholmes75 19:19, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It has a source cited... I would vote for Keep because of this. No opinoin on the contents... --Ton e 19:43, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If accurate, it's paraphrasing the only source. Delete unless the source deserves (and has) an article of its own. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 21:03, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Completely OR (or paraphrased), and quite unencyclopedic. -- Kicking222 22:09, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and cleanup The source is a textbook published by McGraw-Hill, they're pretty reputable, IMO. It does need some heavy copyediting, though. -O bli (Talk)^? 23:10, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the original source would be better to have if someone can find it -O bli (Talk)^? 23:12, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I'm leaning toward Kicking222's sentiments. Can anyone check it for copyright infringement/plagiarism? —Encephalon 04:17, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – if it is in fact a copyvio – Gurch 13:42, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.