Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stacy Ann Fequiere

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Doesn't pass WP:BIO, as per most non-winning contestants on such shows. Black Kite 17:49, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stacy Ann Fequiere[edit]

Finishing unfinished nom for User:Tastyfreeze43. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 00:29, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment not wanting to bite but, did the nom give a reason? Jasynnash2 (talk) 08:08, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment same goes for me, if it just a deletion proposal for the sake of it, I guess we can keep the article.
Delete Same as AfD above, non-winning contestant on a basic-cable game show, come on. L0b0t (talk) 16:42, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Elimination was controversial, several support pages on the web.
Delete. The problem with these various ANTM contestant pages is that outside of the winner, they aren't really notable. Stacy-Ann has yet to prove herself as a model. If/when she does, then this page can be created. If not, then there's no notability established. Just being on a reality show isn't enough to establish notability. And the controversy over her elimination wasn't really a big one, outside of the fansites. (And by the way, please sign your comments.) SKS2K6 (talk) 19:34, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. There are pages for say, the Star-Trek characters, I don't know about them but I assume they are notable in their sphere, well Stacy Ann is notable in the ANTM sphere so why doesn't she deserve her page? Siemgi (talk • contribs) 18:55, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Star Trek characters are known outside of their fanbase. A character like Spock is a notable character on a notable show, 'cause Spock was a character who was on the show for quite a long while. Reality show contestants are there for a few episodes and are gone later. That's not notable in and of itself. Like I said, if Stacy Ann does develop a career later in life, then that's great and a Wikipedia page can be made. But if not, it violates Wikipedia policy due to her lack of notability. A few years from now, will many remember her? Probably not. That's why Star Trek characters are not comparable. Stacy Ann would be comparable to any losing contestant on any reality show. Very few of them merit their own pages, and the ones that do are because they have become bigger (for example, see Jennifer Hudson or Chris Daughtry or Elisabeth Hasselbeck). SKS2K6 (talk) 19:05, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- - - Comment Outside Spock? I don't think so. And Stacy Ann has modelled for Seventeen, has several support pages/videos on the web and was a controversial eliminee.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.