Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stacey Victor Nelson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 15:17, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Stacey Victor Nelson[edit]
- Stacey Victor Nelson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:POLITICIAN - has not been elected to anything Codf1977 (talk) 14:57, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. —Codf1977 (talk) 15:00, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Dakota-related deletion discussions. —Codf1977 (talk) 15:00, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete has not held any public office. Support recreating if elected.--TM 01:25, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:POLITICIAN as a mere candidate for statewide office. I can't see anything sensible to redirect to, so I don't think the standard redirect option for candidates is viable here.--Mkativerata (talk) 01:02, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable as politician. (GregJackP (talk) 01:56, 1 April 2010 (UTC))[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.