Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stacey Mattocks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge. I would add that if the nominator already felt merger was an acceptable action they could have simply proposed as much on the article's talk page. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:04, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stacey Mattocks[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject received media coverage for a Facebook fan page, in what I believe this is a case of WP:BLP1E. Depodded by article with the explanation: "Subj may only have 1 "event", it is significant as she was integral in getting 1st African Amer sitcom that was canx 2b revived which is major in the AA community she will not remain a low profile"; the latter part of which, if I understand correctly, is some pretty heavy WP:CRYSTAL.Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:55, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Slight merge to The Game (U.S. TV series)#Cancellation and revival because the subject's notability appears to stem primarily from her involvement in promoting the show through a Facebook page, which eventually she was hired by a television network to maintain. Or, as a second choice, delete per nom. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:20, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, and I would be more than happy with this merge, per WP:PRESERVE. There is noteworthy info that should be preserved, somewhere. Sorry, I should have mentioned that in my nom. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:41, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:32, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:04, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy close as merge in accordance with WP:SK ground 1: the nominator is happy with this as an alternative to deletion, and no other arguments for deletion exist apart from the nominator.—S Marshall T/C 12:14, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.