Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stable band

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Alex Bakharev 11:32, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stable band[edit]

Article about a band that has no released albums, as far as I can tell. The article looks like a collection of unverifiable original research, and the only sources of any kind given are a few MySpace band pages. Google shows no relevant hits for STABLE, STABLE band, or Stable band.

The article was tagged as a speedy delete, but the tag was removed by the creator. I basically didn't feel 100% sure it was a speedy, so I figured a few extra pairs of eyes couldn't hurt. --Slowking Man 18:30, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related page because it is about a song by the band:

For The Record

--Slowking Man 18:32, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both articles. Band does not currently meet WP:MUSIC's notability criteria. --Muchness 21:24, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Z388 21:27, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I was the one who placed the speedy delete template so my opinion is already on record. Very much a WP:MUSIC failure. Palfrey 22:39, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and tag re-added. I was going to refrain from saying "speedy" because a sysop was kind enough to start this, but the way this page is written shows that it was created to be nothing but blatant promotion of a totally non-notable band, and we must not tolerate such vanity pages to exist. Kavadi carrier 05:05, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As the writer of this article I can say that STABLE are in fact influential within the Yorkshire area of England. This surely means that they should be able to remain in the encyclopedia. If there is anything that I can do to make the article less bias for example, then please do not hesitate to tell me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oliverstable (talk • contribs) (Comment moved from top of page—please leave new comments at the bottom! Kavadi carrier 10:01, 5 November 2006 (UTC))[reply]
- If they really have made an impact, then there should be at least two articles about them in reliable sources, such as newspapers or magazines, which have independently written about your band. Right now no mention of anything like this has been forthcoming. Kavadi carrier 10:01, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.