Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Theresita's Academy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:05, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

St. Theresita's Academy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is not real and data is wrong. Haroldok (talk) 14:01, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 October 4. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 14:23, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 15:08, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Not sure why the current Wikipedia article or the academy is not real or wrong but these are not grounds for deletion. There are sources here, suggesting it is definitely "real". The academy is at least 75 years old.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:17, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:47, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The article is of a real school, and the data is correct. The nominator is apparently an unskilled editor. — •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ• ^Speak! 12:38, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the nominator's statement that "This is not real" is incorrect as there are a number of independent sources that confirm the existence of the school. I can't comment on "and data is wrong" but if data is wrong then the way forward is to fix it and add a reference (best) or tag it appropriately. Indeed, the sourcing of the page is woeful and I have tagged for improvement. Having said that, this is a long-established school containing a high school and it looks notable. Currently, no valid grounds for deletion have been given nor has evidence been adduced that, with a search for local sources, WP:GNG cannot be met. The Whispering Wind (talk) 19:45, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. No real reason given to delete a secondary school. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:06, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:28, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per longstanding consensus at AfD that high schools of confirmed existence are automatically considered notable. Carrite (talk) 15:35, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.