Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Therese of Infant Jesus Catholic Church, Kandanvilai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:57, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

St. Therese of Infant Jesus Catholic Church, Kandanvilai[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY. First church dedicated to this saint seems like trivia rather than notability. Age of church not significant, many old churches. Boleyn (talk) 21:08, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 00:30, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't see the sources out there to declare this particular church notable as such - but, again, I could always be wrong. This isn't the sort of title that makes for a useful redirect, but if we do decide that a redirect makes sense then I would suggest targeting List of places named after St. Thérèse of Lisieux, since this church is also listed there. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 16:25, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete per User:Bearian/Standards#Notability_of_historic_churches. It would be notable, assuming such could be sourced, due to its annual feast and bells. I'm not sure how being the first church named for a 'saint-to-be' would count as notable. Moreover, I don't see anything that would otherwise mark it as notable, say, large size of the building or its age (myriads of churches were built in the 1920s and are still standing). Bearian (talk) 19:02, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.