Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Nazaire (film) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Result: Redirect/Merge Hasteur (talk) 13:19, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

St. Nazaire (film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I removed the prod from this article because a previous version has been prodded and discussed at AFD. Since it has 2 more references and has been slightly expanded from the version previously deleted as a result of the first AFD, I'm starting a second nomination instead of deleting it under CSD G4. Original concern was WP:CRYSTAL issues. Ron Ritzman (talk) 05:09, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 05:11, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect/merge to David Yates#Future projects where this topic is already best currently discussed per WP:NFF. The project "currently in development" does not have the enduring wide coverage to merit being one of those very rare exceptions to WP:NFF. Userfy a version to its author if requested. I have removed to film infobox,[1] as those are not to be used until principle filming has been confirmed in a reliable source. Note: If it had had enough coverage, its title would have had to be moved to St. Nazaire (film project) as a disambig. But it does not. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 10:01, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to David Yates#Future projects per the notability guidelines for future films. If filming starts, the article can be recreated. Erik (talk | contribs) 15:31, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.