Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Lucie West Centennial High School

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn (although I was a participant in this AfD, and arguably the most major contributor to the article) I am closing this AfD procedurally, because the nominator removed the AfD notice from the article and struckthrough their nomination here. So my closing is really just documenting a non-admin closure by another party that was incomplete. JERRY talk contribs 17:04, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Concur per nom's comment here. No problem. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 16:13, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

St. Lucie West Centennial High School[edit]

St. Lucie West Centennial High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Page reads like WP:TRIVIA ("Officials say the school smells of Elderberries.", etc) and its importance is not asserted. <3 bunny 04:29, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm withdrawing my nomination after seeing improvements made in the article. I think it's a valid stub now, though it still needs some improvements. <3 bunny 16:58, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Grr, another school. Wisdom89 (T / C) 04:30, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Blank the page and start over, but ultimately keep - The article should be kept, but there's not really any valid content in it at the moment. matt91486 (talk) 04:33, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This one should go. Read it carefully. Student joke. Not that an article could not be written about the school, but it should be started over. If anyone wants to speedy this one, I'd have no objection. DGG (talk) 04:35, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment. I have CSD'ed this article (with category A7, but I feel G1 might work for it too), but the creator removed it on the basis schools do not qualify for CSD, and out of ignorance I put it on AFD instead. <3 bunny 04:37, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per above. The article is all POV --Antonio Lopez (talk) 04:44, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I removed the hoax material and marked the article as a stub. The artice's creator may attempt to restore some hoax material; please keep an eye on the article. --Eastmain (talk) 04:44, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment. Eastmain, I've had to undo your edit because you removed the CSD template. Please redo the edit, keeping the CSD template this time. <3 bunny 04:46, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • Comment on Comment CyberSach, wouldn't it have been more effective to just restore the CSD template? --SSBohio 04:51, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep & Stubbify (ec³) No reason to delete has been stated or can readily be determined. I suggest we stubbify the article (assuming it's a real high school) and move on. --SSBohio 04:51, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Man I just keep getting in trouble and told on. I'm getting my feelings hurt. I think you should just leave the page alone and edit a page that will actually get read. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Operationquietnoise (talk • contribs) 05:10, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Just some advice, I would take the time to improve the article, flesh it out, establish more notability (even though most schools are inherently notable), and stop fighting with other editors. If you feel strongly about the article, focus your attention on copyediting and expanding it. Wisdom89 (T / C) 05:17, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Keep - I always want to assume good faith, but I think page creator is pulling our chain. BusterD (talk) 05:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Well, I'm pretty sure the school is real regardless of that. matt91486 (talk) 05:23, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Current version bears no resemblance to the coatrack for personal abuse I tried to G10 last night. BusterD (talk) 15:41, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I just discovered that the edit button works on this article for some reason. JERRY talk contribs 06:01, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
speedy keep on the general priniciple that nominating an article the minute it is created is bad faith Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 06:56, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
comment, however, having read Operationquietnoise's entire edit history, I am certain he is a vandal, and lying about teaching at the school as he claims on the talk page, so if there is a motion for any sort of block, I would be all for that. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 07:02, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have applied to WP:AIV that Operationquietnoise is a vandal account, and the account has now been blocked. I now have zero reservations about keeping this page, though I suspect we'll see this user return. BusterD (talk) 16:03, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as a valid stub. Compare the version that was nominated for AfD with the current version and you will most likely agree. Sting au Buzz Me... 07:05, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Gary King (talk) 09:22, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/St._Lucie_West_Centennial_High_School&oldid=1138788197"