Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Srikanth Velamakanni

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:49, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Srikanth Velamakanni[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Shallow coverage in RSs. See also: Pranay Agrawal. Rentier (talk) 11:33, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:01, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:01, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades^Godric 04:07, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: As the nominator says, the reference coverage is shallow, featuring such as a presentation photo name-check and a biography repeated in event material. I don't see the subject's company role as providing inherited individual notability. There is also a Q&A piece here. Some notability in his field may be arguable by virtue of his inclusion in a "10 Most Influential Analytics Leaders in India" (though that inclusion probably involves an in-role element) and serving on a NASSCOM committee, but my view is that these are insufficient to demonstrate biographical notabiility. AllyD (talk) 07:31, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 08:54, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for lack of independent, in-depth sources for the subject. I'm only seeing PR-driven coverage in WP:SPIP sources; no achievements independent of the company. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:27, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.