Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Shanmugha Educational Institutions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Go Phightins! 11:33, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sri Shanmugha Educational Institutions[edit]

Sri Shanmugha Educational Institutions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No single source cited before now. Fails WP:GNG Jenyire2 18:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Jenyire2 18:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:07, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:07, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: No sources to establish notability and written like advertisement. The article is ceeated from a single purpose account. Kichu🐘 Discuss 05:16, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – Sources provided by from same party. Notability not found. TheDreamBoat (talk) 03:12, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Accredited degree-awarding tertiary institutions. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:00, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Degree-awarding institution or not, prior consensus and the notability guidelines are clear that private schools should be treated no differently then any other private organizations when it comes to them following the notability guidelines. Which this school doesn't due to the lacking state of the sourcing. So, there's zero guideline or consensus based reason to keep the article. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:11, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.