Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Rama Rao Gandikota

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mz7 (talk) 04:41, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sri Rama Rao Gandikota[edit]

Sri Rama Rao Gandikota (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Run-of-the-mill career graph of a retired Commander. No evidence of notability. Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, WP:MILPEOPLE. His philately work could hold some water but no WP:SIGCOV and poorly sourced. Author of the article has CoI (son). RationalPuff (talk) 18:19, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 18:19, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 18:19, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 18:19, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: There is nothing in the article that shows he served in a top level post or an important role in any war. Fails WP:NSOLDIER requirements. He served in the war as an officer but it is not clear if he served any leading role in the operation he participated in. Walrus Ji (talk) 19:47, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: After a WP:BEFORE search the subject has not received WP:SIGCOV in a WP:RS therefore does not meet the notability requirements WP:N and should not be included in the encyclopedia. --ARoseWolf (Talk) 21:01, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG. Mztourist (talk) 07:04, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete promotional and written by his son[1]. Should have been CSD'ed long ago. Kges1901 (talk) 19:12, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, WP:MILL, WP:NOTWEBHOST, and WP:GNG. In 2008 that would be excusable, but in 2021, everybody knows we are not a free web host for your daddy's web page. Bearian (talk) 19:37, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.