Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Lanka Army Women's Corps

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. LTA account that was globally locked and a pretty clear consensus to keep. (non-admin closure) Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 04:53, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sri Lanka Army Women's Corps[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Given references are not strong enough about the topic, also there should be a logo of the regiment, it has been mentioned that the regiment was created by the help of British Army's Women's Royal Army Corps but no citation has been given for this speech. Tushar Bishal Femin 93 talk to me, see my contributions 07:24, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 May 31. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:37, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:49, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:49, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:49, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The topic is obviously notable and firmly established by the sources. It may be improved, but it is out of place at AfD. 188.218.87.34 (talk) 08:12, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clearly notable topic per WP:MILUNIT and common sense. Lack of referencing does not equal lack of notability. AfD is not cleanup. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:05, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: lack of a logo is not a ground for deletion. Clearly notable army unit. PamD 12:56, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And it's now got a logo, or insignia - @Raja Kaiya Vacha: beat me to it while I was uploading the file! PamD 13:03, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a large national military formation this is inherently notable. Polyamorph (talk) 19:09, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes MILUNIT. Searching I do see quite a few sources referring to the Women's Corps. Icewhiz (talk) 12:14, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.