Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Squaremouth (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:25, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Squaremouth[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

What is the encyclopedic reason of this article? Simple Autopromotion.

Comment - I completed the AfD for IP 193.234.224.142. Ansh666 18:03, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, I think the same way; this article is self-referential and self-promotional. The essence of this article is not encyclopedic. What is reason and purpose of this article? This company is known in how many countries? How many offices are there around the world? How many people work in these offices? Why does Wikipedia-English have so many American companies who want to self-label themselves as “notable”? Should we not think more globalized? Is USA the only country where the English language is spoken? What should we think about other companies that are better known in other continents? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.185.183.119 (talk) 14:36, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 00:21, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:55, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article appears to violate WP:PROMOTION, as there is little content apart from the very basic history of the company and what services they offer. -- Jkudlick (talk) 04:43, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.