Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spy Changers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Transformers: Robots in Disguise (toy line). Redirect can be retargeted if anyone has a better idea. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:02, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spy Changers[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 02:27, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 02:27, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Autobots. There is only one non-primary source being used, and it is being used only to get the information on two of the character's voice actors, and does nothing to establish any sort of notability or support any of the copious amounts of cruft present in the article. I was considering suggesting a redirect to List of Transformers: Robots in Disguise (2001 TV series) characters instead, but as it seems that this group appeared in more than one series, the general Autobot list seems like it would be the better place for the redirect. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 18:00, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 21:49, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not convinced that this topic warrants its own article. Deleting, merging or redirecting are plausible options. Josh Milburn (talk) 22:47, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Transformers: Robots in Disguise (toy line) (since it's just a toy line and not from the TV series). I'm seeing a lot of sales websites, a ton of blogs, and nothing really showing that this sub-line of toys was ever more than just a way to make a buck. Primefac (talk) 23:21, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.