Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spy6teen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 15:46, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Spy6teen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very limited coverage in secondary sources, which seem to do nothing more than establish that this webcomic exists and is still published. The link provided to "list of monthly Zuda contestants" is a link to another wikipedia article (and thus can't be used as a source), and indicates nothing other than that there are several Zuda contestants every month and that the subject of the article was one of them in 2009. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 14:50, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:48, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable publication. Wickedjacob (talk) 02:42, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet the WP:NOTABILITY standard of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Sharksaredangerous (talk) 19:12, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Honolulu Advertiser reference meets the WP:NOTABILITY standard of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Citizentim (talk • contribs) 19:29, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest you review WP:GNG. The Advertiser is a decent enough source, but it is only one and I'm not sure even that article represents significant coverage. Wickedjacob (talk) 21:31, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.