Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spot in the Woods

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Gerard Basset. J04n(talk page) 12:31, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spot in the Woods[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advert for non-notable B&B. Per the PROD no available sources to improve to satisy WP:Notability. Polyamorph (talk) 19:19, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Until today, the article was about the hotel at the same location owned by the same people, called TerraVina. I'm not familiar with determining the notability of restaurants/hotels as they would be expected to garner some coverage routinely, but there is certainly RS-coverage of the former location: [1] [2] [3]. There is also some industry coverage about the relaunch: [4]. SmartSE (talk) 20:31, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Even if the refs weren't dead, most of them refer to the owners and not the hotel. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:07, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 10:31, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 10:31, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 10:31, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect I am seeing a great deal of SIGCOV in a Proquest news search on Terravina. it does not seem possible for a story to cover Terravina without discussing Basset. Indeed, why should they? The point of going there appears to be Basset's expertise. Still, there is a lot of coverage. Far too much notability to make deletion appropriate.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:58, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It would be helpful if you posted examples of significant coverage, I see some restaurant reviews (of Terravina not spot in the woods), but are reviews significant coverage? Also notability of the owners does not transfer to this restaurant without significant coverage. No point redirecting to Terravina since that is a redirect to this page! So you must mean redirect to Gerard Basset? Polyamorph (talk) 07:35, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 01:33, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, redirect to Gerard Basset there are quite a lot of INDEPTH reviews of the hotel Terravina. Also this long story in the Telegraph, The infamous tale behind hotelier's success story: Journalists brought to town by murder trial helped to launch boutique business; Burn-Callander, Rebecca. The Daily Telegraph; London (UK) [London (UK)15 Dec 2015: 8.] (detailing how the hotel's reputation was made when reporters covering the Rosemary West trial told foodie colleagues about the hotel, which reaped a harvest of press.) And this one: A hotel and restaurant couple 20 years on; Lander, Nicholas. FT.com; London (Feb 14, 2009). Perhaps the Basset article ought to be an article about both proprietors, and their successful partnership.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:42, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per the above and my earlier comment. SmartSE (talk) 07:19, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Utterly fails the criteria for establishing notability. Notability is not inherited and while the co-owner appears to have their own page, there is nothing to indicate that a redirect is required. A merge of any appropriate information appears to be the best solution. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:04, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Insufficient media coverage fails WP:GNG. Every hotel - from 1 to 5 stars - gets reviews. That's a given. The key is to find press coverage to separate the most noteworthy hotels. If this were a sufficiently notable business, the name change would have garnered more coverage than this single piece I found on a hospitality marketing site.[[5]] Also perhaps WP:TOOSOON - we can always revisit if the name change spurs attention and generates media coverage. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 21:08, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.