Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spot News 18

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:07, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spot News 18[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Non a notable company. Fails to have WP:RS sources. Juggyevil (talk) 21:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)~~ (sock strike — DaxServer (t · c) 11:23, 9 March 2022 (UTC))[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Juggyevil (talk) 21:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Juggyevil (talk) 21:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Juggyevil (talk) 21:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Juggyevil (talk) 21:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Juggyevil (talk) 21:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Keep I have done much research and published it on Wikipedia as a Wikipedia contributor. And during my research, I have found that this website is popular in India, and they also have readers around the world. They have also been featured on many websites. I have only mentioned a few in the sources. As per Wikipedia guidelines, this article satisfies all the requirements on Wikipedia.--998ashish (talk) 04:59, 2 March 2022 (UTC) (sock (see SUL) strike — DaxServer (t · c) 08:31, 3 March 2022 (UTC))[reply]
Keep I disagree with Juggyevil (talk), it's a notable company, and they have been mentioned by other renowned news and media companies. Such as ZEE5, Latestly and My Nation. They have a WP:RS reliable and trusted source. Recheck their sources, and very it all the sources are very popular. So I request Wikipedia to keep this article on their platform. And protect this page from getting edited or modified to safeguard the article because the uncreassy changes are done on this article, which affects the article's trustworthiness on Wikipedia. --Sunilyadav457 (talk) 10:25, 2 March 2022 (UTC) (sock strike — DaxServer (t · c) 09:51, 10 March 2022 (UTC))[reply]
Noting that 99ashish is locked, and Sunilyadav457 has no edits outside this topic. Best, Vermont (talk) 00:48, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:20, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep After searching Spot News 18 on google. I find many trusted companies that refer to them, such as ZEE5, Latestly, My Nation, and much more. So they satisfy all the need to be on Wikipedia. They have been a feature in Notable Sources WP:RS, WP:GNG, and WP:NCORP, so I will recommend keeping this article on Wikipedia. --720vikas (talk) 08:57, 9 March 2022 (UTC) (sock strike — DaxServer (t · c) 09:50, 10 March 2022 (UTC))[reply]
Vermont Sir, Another one 720vikas has no edits outside this topic.😁 Cinzia007 (talk) 10:43, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I can’t see my vote. Someone removed it? Is it allowed to remove vote of other people? -_- Laptopinmyhands (talk) 14:59, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not realising WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 01:39, 9 March 2022 (UTC) (restoring user's !vote removed(?) by 720vikas here — DaxServer (t · c) 15:58, 9 March 2022 (UTC))[reply]

Comment Really Sorry Laptopinmyhands (talk) I by mistake deleted your comment. Thanks to DaxServer (t · c) for Restoring your Comment. --720vikas (talk) 16:19, 9 March 2022 (UTC) (sock strike — DaxServer (t · c) 09:50, 10 March 2022 (UTC))[reply]
Delete, per arguments above. In addition to GNG and most passages being unsourced, two of the sources appear independent but contain the exact same text. Questioning their validity as independent. YuriNikolai (talk) 21:13, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no independent coverage. The MyNation article is "featured content" (read: paid promotion), and the other two are likely the same.-KH-1 (talk) 00:08, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - They are notable, and they have been referred from notable sources. All conditions of Wikipedia criteria are met. --43.231.213.170 (talk) 13:35, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.