Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SpotOn Transact

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 01:35, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SpotOn Transact[edit]

SpotOn Transact (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional page created by SPA. No evidence of notability; all apparent RS references are funding rounds, which are not usable for notability under WP:CORPDEPTH. A WP:BEFORE shows no evidence of coverage passing WP:CORP, WP:GNG or any other notability guideline; it's all press releases and a bit of churnalism in advertorial outlets. Needs three RSes with actual independent coverage to survive. PROD removed with no attempt to address issues. David Gerard (talk) 10:10, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 10:10, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 10:10, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 10:10, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 10:10, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - promotional article about an unremarkable startup. Author tried to avoid the avoid the scrutiny of this debate by moving the article to draft space and blanking it. MER-C 15:32, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 12:40, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.