Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SpongeBob SquarePants (seasons 8-9)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Scott Mac (Doc) 20:19, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SpongeBob SquarePants (seasons 8-9)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Should -and already is- part of another article Idontusenumbers (talk) 19:43, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This content should exist only on List_of_SpongeBob_SquarePants_episodes —Preceding unsigned comment added by Idontusenumbers (talk • contribs) 19:45, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of SpongeBob SquarePants episodes. Not enough information to warrant an article yet. And it goes against standard naming of season articles. BOVINEBOY 2008 :) 06:10, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of SpongeBob SquarePants episodes#Seasons 8-9. There is barely any information, so this article can be recreated when season 8 episodes are released, but without the "-9" part. This is my first AFD comment, so hopefully this comment is okay.--Ha dg er 03:43, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per User:Hadger Rlendog (talk) 21:00, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It makes no sense to have a combination of two seasons when the rest of ther progression is season by season, not even as a redirect. -- Whpq (talk) 17:08, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Whpq is correct. I would have said redirect, but come to think of it, there's no point in redirecting whatsoever. "SpongeBob SquarePants (seasons 8-9)" is not a plausible search term and therefore it doesn't need redirection. There's no point in treating them as a single entity. When the time comes for an article on season 8, the article will be called "season 8" so there's no reason for this article to exist. Swarm^(Talk) 04:34, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, oddball "seasons 8-9" construction not supported by pesky reality. Abductive (reasoning) 06:31, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The two seasons/40 episodes claim is not supported by the reference. Reference 1 says nothing about two seasons, it says there will be "another season" and 26 new episodes - even the title says "'SpongeBob' Renewed for 26 Episodes". (Can't tell what ref 2 said, as it's a 404, but it's an older ref and was about the 10th anniversary). I think the information that there are new episodes commissioned should be added to the SpongeBob SquarePants article, which is actually out of date -- Boing! said Zebedee 10:00, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.