Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spokes for the Wheel of Torment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The_Cuckoo_Clocks_of_Hell. Fritzpoll (talk) 12:39, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spokes for the Wheel of Torment[edit]

Article for an individual song that has no real reason given for notability. didn't chart or win an award. reference gives no indication of notability is trivial coverage. This was bundled at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Welcome to Bucketheadland but has been moved to it's own afd. Discussion has occurred there. Duffbeerforme (talk) 05:28, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say ignore that discussion for clarity. Repeating, redirect to the album article. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:33, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The song is mainly notable for its video based on famous triptychs by Hieronymus Bosch. The video clip has been included to several compilation DVDs such as Anxious Animation and Secret Recipe and was shown at some festivals around the world (see 2005 bitfilm festival and 52nd Sydney Film Festival for example). The article is clearly in bad shape and the Buckethead Taskforce is willing to change this in short time. Therefore the article has been tagged as "needing immediate atention" even prior to this AfD.--Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 07:30, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- So you are saying that the song is notable because of the fame of its music video which comes from, for examples, film festivals about famous music videos? Ignoring the overly technical argument that the music video deserves an article not the song, WP:MUSIC cites "ranked on national or significant music charts, won significant awards or honors or been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups" for probably notability and unless the festivals are somehow notable, I'm not sure I think that's enough. I'm not being snarky or anything. I'm just trying to see it. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:23, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Same question about the notability of the compilation DVDs. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:26, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - The Sydney Film Festival seems to be notable enough to have an own article here (as it is FIAPF accredited), yes, same for the Secret Recipe disc. In case you don't know Anxious Animation , see the A.V. Club review. It's high on my list for new articles.--Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 08:49, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep AV Club is not trivial coverage, but I wouldn't mind a Merge into The Cuckoo Clocks of Hell. Spinach Monster (talk) 16:12, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The coverage of the song in the AV Club references is trivial, consisting of only one sentence. Duffbeerforme (talk) 05:55, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —--Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 19:36, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: trivial coverage WP:NSONGS. JamesBurns (talk) 02:32, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as several new sources have been found since nomination.--Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 05:57, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Neither of the two new sources are non trivial. Duffbeerforme (talk) 02:46, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 03:57, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.