Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spokenology: You and Me

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Favonian (talk) 17:16, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spokenology: You and Me[edit]

Spokenology: You and Me (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This book does not meet notability requirements as outlined in Wikipedia:Notability (books). Only one of the 'Notes' is independent and most of the 'References' are not about the book itself. This page is essentially unchanged from the draft Draft:Spokenology: You and Me, which was turned down at Articles for Creation. Creation of the article after the draft was declined is a subversion of the AFC process. There is a likely COI here as well, as the article creator is a single-purpose account promoting one individual and his work. See also the related AFD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Shen-Tien Chi. Slideshow Bob (talk) 11:50, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Is quite easy when someone quickly look at one article, and defined to delete it. I truly believe Wikipedia is not like that. I think Wikipedia look at the person as a whole being. If we really want to proof is someone notability. The guidelines can never fulfill. In what we have here today a very special case. That we Wikipedia can not truly place, Luke Shen-Tien Chi in to the form. Because he did something that is not in the norm of our present time. I sincerely hope that we all can come and show some love in this place. To protect the progress creation of this moving world. :] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike7682 (talk • contribs) 14:15, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete:Per nominator, Only created to try and make idea and person notable. Should be notable before Wikipedia article created, not try to gain notoriety by creating Wikipedia article. --VVikingTalkEdits 14:25, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:23, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:23, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete OP's justification for keeping this page was copy/pasted from Luke Shen-Tien Chi deletion discussion, or vise versa. Seems like a WP:PROMO push for a non-notable subject. Comatmebro (talk) 22:36, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'Stays: The source part needs fix for article. No need to delete! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.169.116.26 (talk) 01:09, 30 August 2017 (UTC) [reply]
  • 'Stays: Rejection would clearly be a mistake. Just fix the article! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.119.13.150 (talk) 01:20, 30 August 2017 (UTC) [reply]
  • 'Stays: Not necessary for deletion. The search information on him is true! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.100.4.190 (talk) 01:38, 30 August 2017 (UTC) [reply]
  • Stays: No no. Remove this article would be a great lost for wiki! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.136.5.138 (talk) 08:53, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Can we get more "stays" with exclamation points! Timmyshin (talk) 21:16, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not a notable book. Creator Mike7682 has been blocked, and the multiple IPs voting "stays" are likely the same user evading the block. -Zanhe (talk) 22:04, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Whatz up? I thought i place note here.
  • Delete - Vaguely promotional article about a book that has not adequately been covered in reliable sources. This should have stayed at WP:AfC, at the very least. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 06:42, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Stays: I wonder where all the good editors go. Not here. Stop sweating him!
  • Do Not Remove: Show some respected for others work!
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Spokenology:_You_and_Me&oldid=1138784858"