Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spodi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep. Redwolf24 04:03, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Spodi[edit]
Not encyclopedic. brenneman(t)(c) 01:09, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. Agree it's non-notable, and I've never heard of it. Perhaps a move to WikiCookBook? RasputinAXP talk * contribs 13:23, 16 August 2005 (UTC)Keep based on rewrite. RasputinAXP talk * contribs 01:43, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]- Keep. and clean up. Contains facts and follows all wiki rules except higher standards (thus the cleanup part). Vicarious 16:14, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Low Google hits for spodi + drink (55 unique) screams non-notable term. (Can't say "neologism, because one site claims it was used in a movie in the 50's.) --Icelight 16:40, August 16, 2005 (UTC) Feel free to transwiki to the cookbook if someone feels this should be saved.
- There are some things which exist outside the web. I'd encourage people to ask parents or possibly homeless people (I spoke with one about a spodi) and then vote. As for wikiCookBook, a recipe there would be great but this is not a Mai Tai (which ironically does have an article with recipes) this is more similar to a keg/kegger or coctail/cocktail party, while the specific beer or cocktail should make it to wikiCookBook. Vicarious 17:13, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep you kids need to get out more. SchmuckyTheCat 23:42, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I have entirely re-written this article. SchmuckyTheCat 00:49, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I got out plenty in college. We just used syringes to inject the liquor straight into the watermelon. ;) RasputinAXP talk * contribs 01:43, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I have entirely re-written this article. SchmuckyTheCat 00:49, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep based on re-write. Trollderella 01:18, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Now valuable. Punkmorten 09:40, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.