Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Splashgear

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:49, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Splashgear[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I tried, first tagging this for cleanup. Then, as I looked more closely, I found I could not spot how it passed WP:CORP. The referencing is poor. Interviews with the principal, passing mentions, a dead link. Islamic compliant swimwear is an excellent topic, but this is a poor attempt by an apparently undisclosed paid (or at least COI) editor to use AFC to conceal an advert behind a welter of references. Fiddle Faddle 15:32, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 15:32, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 15:32, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:03, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logs: 2020-03 move to → Draft:Splashgear, 2017-09 ✗ deleted, 2015-02 ✗ G12, 2015-02 ✗ deleted, 2015-02 ✗ deleted

Delete Per the reasonable analysis of the sources by the nominator. Although sources do exist on this, they seem to be trivial passing mentions and the article was created/edited by a COI user. So, I see nothing about it to justify an article. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:41, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.