Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spirit Music Show

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:48, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Spirit Music Show

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Spirit Music Show (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a television show, not reliably sourced as passing our notability criteria for television shows. The notability claim on offer here is that it existed, which is not automatic grounds for a Wikipedia article in and of itself in the absence of a WP:GNG-worthy volume of reliable source coverage about it to establish its significance -- but the sole source present in the article is the presence of an entry for one episode in an IMDB-like directory of film and television soundtracks, which is not a reliable or notability-building source, and even on a database search I can't find anything else. Bearcat (talk) 02:18, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 02:18, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 02:18, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:53, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jackattack1597 (talk) 10:32, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.