Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spiralmouth (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:19, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spiralmouth[edit]

Spiralmouth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article that was deleted at afd a long time ago, deleted a couple times after that, and stuck around when created the fourth time despite still having no sources. 8 years later it still has no sources. There are some credits which could be a weak claim to notability, but my search didn't yield any significant coverage. Given the afd was so long ago, even though this was recreated not long after its third deletion, going back to afd seem the best route. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:50, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:50, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:50, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:50, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:00, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.