Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spence Kovak

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Jeremy Piven. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 01:52, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spence Kovak[edit]

Spence Kovak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fictional character who has "been in four series", except that he was really only a central character in one of them and a one-off fictional crossover guest in any of the others. And even more importantly, the article just consists of a single sentence asserting his existence and a table of his appearances, while not demonstrating or sourcing even the first hint of a reason why he would warrant an independent article about his existence (such as, y'know, some real-world context for what might make him a notable television character.) Delete. Bearcat (talk) 22:44, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 23:00, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Not a notable character. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 23:02, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Jeremy Piven as in any case this may be a useful disambiguation page but I also suppose it would be best connected with Jeremy. SwisterTwister talk 07:29, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.