Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spellhold Studios

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango 123 (e) 04:44, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spellhold Studios[edit]

A non notable modding group. A Google search turns up less than 600 results.--PatCheng 01:23, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete per nom. They seem pretty notable within the modding community but I don't think that's saying enough. --Hyperbole 01:40, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Feezo (Talk) 01:41, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nn. — Kimchi.sg | Talk 01:43, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable modding community --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 02:37, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:WEB, WP:CRUFT, WP:VAIN, WP:SPAM, and WP:VSCA. Royboy crashfan 03:13, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 09:10, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nn, vanispamcruftisment. --Ter e nc e Ong 13:57, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 17:38, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete NN -M^ask 00:58, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete NN. Arbusto 06:49, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.