Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Specific cost

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Direct costs. ✗plicit 13:29, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Specific cost[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:DICDEF; there is no coverage of this term in and of itself. Qwerfjkl talk 12:59, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to direct cost: sufficient given text in article for its content to be folded into direct cost and this redirected since these are names for the same concept. Foonblace (talk) 14:01, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 00:17, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect: I agree with Foonblace, but currently direct cost redirects to the variable cost which is incorrect. I'm going to fix that now. The new direct should go to direct costs (note the plural) -- Bob drobbs (talk) 01:08, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Direct costs per Bob drobbs. BD2412 T 02:11, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Direct costs per Bob drobbs. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:37, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.