Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sparkle (actress)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:02, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sparkle (actress)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography, sourced only to IMDb with no evidence of any reliable source coverage shown at all, of an actress whose only credited roles were bit parts. As always, every actress does not automatically get an article just because she existed -- she must be reliably sourced as passing an WP:NACTOR criterion, but this isn't. Bearcat (talk) 17:18, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 20:17, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 20:17, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:44, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete total lack of reliable sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:19, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Lacks notability and fails WP:NACTOR. I ran an online search to look for reliable sources on this actress and didn't find anything that supported notability. Shelbystripes (talk) 21:25, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.