Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spare Rides

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:10, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spare Rides[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about an organization, which features almost no substance beyond "it exists" and is sourced to just two pieces of relatively WP:ROUTINE local coverage with no evidence of the wider coverage that it takes to clear WP:CORPDEPTH. Something like this would have to operate more than just locally, or at least be getting coverage beyond its own city, to qualify for a Wikipedia article about it. Bearcat (talk) 18:11, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- the article fails to establish notability, while being promotional at the same time. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:54, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.