Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spare Philosophy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:58, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Spare Philosophy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although the article appears to have a few references none are inline, as such it is difficult to ascertain notability. Tentontunic (talk) 16:28, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Rubbish. Philosophy Teacher (talk) 01:40, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
delete no evidence of notability William M. Connolley (talk) 09:42, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. MurfleMan (talk) 02:39, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.