Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spanish National Bioinformatics Institute

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz ^Humbug! 09:36, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish National Bioinformatics Institute[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG - it is an institute which conducts research, but not at the necessary level of significance and hasn't attracted sufficient coverage. Boleyn (talk) 15:24, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:36, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:36, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 19:21, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"the necessary level of significance"? There seems to be plenty of coverage in Spanish media. Rathfelder (talk) 10:22, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Rathfelder, thanks for looking at this and commenting. You've mentioned coverage, which reliable refs have you found that establish gng? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 11:50, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I dont read Spanish. But a national institute like this is generally presumed to be notable. "Instituto Nacional de Bioinformatica" generates 317 mentions. Rathfelder (talk) 12:22, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amkgp 💬 04:21, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete According to LinkedIn "The Spanish National Bioinformatics Institute ('Instituto Nacional de Bioinformática' - INB), founded in 2003 with a decentralized model, is the bioinformatics technology platform of the Carlos III Health Institute." Going off of that, it sounds like Spanish National Bioinformatics Institute isn't an actual institute itself, but an information technology platform ran by one. Therefore, it's not notable under the guidelines for institutions and there isn't any reliable sources out there about it to make it notable under any other standard (I assume it would be WP:NSOFT). I'm willing to change revisit my vote if it turns out to be an institution after all though. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:18, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I've tidied up and expanded the stub. I think it already may make it per GNG.--Asqueladd (talk) 15:36, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. This is actually a small research group, no clear evidence of notability. The leader of the group is notable, but we already have a page about him. My very best wishes (talk) 01:31, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You should vote delete or merge then. I'm pretty sure you can even though you already voted keep. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:46, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeh, I would say this is actually delete. I do not think there is anything to merge. My very best wishes (talk) 01:54, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kj cheetham (talk) 22:31, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. I am not seeing much to help this meet WP:NORG, some mentions in passing, etc. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:27, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY. Timely fix to an important article. I rate it a start. Bearian (talk) 01:17, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.