Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spain–Tunisia relations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:19, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spain–Tunisia relations[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notable relations and fails to provide useful information. Philosophy2 (talk) 03:54, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:26, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tunisia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:26, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 05:52, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, almost neighbours. The areas have had contact back to Carthage. Geschichte (talk) 22:56, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There are a plethora of sources that satisfy notability, especially since 2011, as Spain-Tunisia relations have deepened. Among these: backing of a democratic Tunisian government by the Spanish government (1), visit of the foreign Minister of Tunisia to the King of Spain (2, 3), scientific cooperation between the two countries (4), anti-trafficking support from Spain (5), COVID-19 humanitarian help (6), the signing of 8 bilateral cooperation agreements in 2018 (7); and various diplomatic announcements, such as Tunisia calling Spain an "important ally" within the EU (8), Spain congratulating the new 2019 government in Tunisia (9), Spain calling for calm after the destitution of the Tunisian PM in July of this year (10), and more. This begs the question: what steps has the nominator taken the time to go through during WP:BEFORE? Pilaz (talk) 14:06, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - have had bilateral relations for centuries and, even in the modern era, this is covered heavily in the media as demonstrated above by Pilaz Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:42, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Pilaz. ~Junedude433 (talk) 04:20, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep Bonkers. The article satisfies GNG by far. The nominating pattern of Philosophy2 is becoming WP:DISRUPTIVE.--Asqueladd (talk) 18:10, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.