Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sovprime

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:20, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sovprime[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:MADEUP, unreferenced, non-notable neologism per WP:NEO, not a trace of it online. Prod contested by creator. MuffledThud (talk) 13:53, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —MuffledThud (talk) 13:54, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Search gives no evidence of the word's existing outside Wikipedia (ignoring hits for "SOV prime", etc, with no connection at all with the meaning given here). The article actually states that the term was made up by a "trader at Delaware Investments" on February 2nd 2010. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:17, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious delete Brand-new, recently invented neologism, no evidence on Google that it has passed into the language, or ever been used by anyone other than its inventor. --MelanieN (talk) 15:50, 4 February 2010 (UTC)MelanieN[reply]
Delete - "A phrase coined by Sean Simmons, CFA, an FX trader at Delaware Investments on Tuesday, February 2nd 2010," - looks like a Wp:NEO (with shades of Wp:OR) to me. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 16:17, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per WP:MADEUP. Joe Chill (talk) 22:37, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.