Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southern Vectis route 1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 16:27, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Southern Vectis route 1[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable bus route, The article is sourced to a number of of sources which are either primary or tangential to the route as a whole neither of which establish notability per the General notability guidleines which require "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Any key information can be inserted into the Southern Vectis article but doesn't need its own sprawling article with an unsourced/unsourceable history. Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 14:54, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- I have been voting to delete lists of bus routes. I hardly believed that we would get a whole article on a single route. If there are more, please to a multiple nomination for them all. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:23, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. All of the supplied refs either make just passing mention of the route or are routine notices such as timetables, demonstrating it is non-notable. I haven't looked through all the articles on Southern Vectis routes, but I suspect all the routes are similarly non-notable. I think a multiple nomination of all these articles is warranted — I hope someone knows how to do this.—A bit iffy (talk) 17:06, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Unless there is something notable about the route itself, other than being a route (if that makes sense?). --FoolMeOnce2Times (talk) 19:12, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple nominations aren't a problem, and I did consider it but a test case (i.e; this nomination) ensures that there is a general consensus for or against these specific articles. If this closes on Delete I'll assess and list all similar vectis routes. Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 17:20, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds reasonable—A bit iffy (talk) 19:08, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A few tourist bus routes may be notable but this is not one of them.--Charles (talk) 22:47, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.