Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southern Vectis bus fleet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 22:21, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Southern Vectis bus fleet[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD declined by IP with no previous edits. Not a notable subject per WP:GNG. Can only ever be drawn mainly from primary sources or unreliable blogs. Charles (talk) 21:19, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:21, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:21, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:21, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Doesn't really warrant an article. aycliffe^talk 21:18, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as fails WP:GNG, Could add all into a dinky box just here. Davey2010T 21:23, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - We have an article on Southern Vectis, tagged as out of date. We do not need one on its bus fleet. The article will frequently go out of date as the comnpany buys or scraps buses. There may possibly be something to merge to the company article, but I hope it is not much! Peterkingiron (talk) 18:26, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Southern Vectis#Fleet - As it currently stands this article will go out of date quickly since there are not many contributors to it, however redirecting is better than deleting since it automatically directs incoming links to the appropriate section, and the history is preserved. Q6637p (talk) 18:50, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.