Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southern Miss–UAB football rivalry (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 17:14, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Southern Miss–UAB football rivalry[edit]

Southern Miss–UAB football rivalry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-GNG context

  • Prior Dec 2014 AfD was unanimous delete.
  • UAB team was disbanded 2015-2016.
  • Article was then recreated April 2016 (based on no additional, core information).
  • Series has resumed with only the October 2017 game played since AfD.
  • Teams are both members of the West division of Conference USA.

Article has four citations for rivalry including one from AP which state rivalry, all of which predate UAB's 2017 return to football. I lean towards delete re WP:GNG and "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention," but keep is reasonable especially if based on additional cites. UW Dawgs (talk) 02:49, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Regards, KCVelaga (talk • mail) 12:02, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. Regards, KCVelaga (talk • mail) 12:02, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. Regards, KCVelaga (talk • mail) 12:02, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete previous AFD resulted in delete without controversy, and I can see no compelling reason to bring the article back (not really seeing a passage of WP:GNG for the rivalry itself). I think it was a good-faith attempt to bring the article back, I just don't see what notability measure it passes.-Paul McDonald (talk) 16:58, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.