Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southampton Operatic Society (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. czar 22:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Southampton Operatic Society[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG, or that there is an WP:ATD. 2009 AfD resulted in no consensus but standards were significantly lower then. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn (talk) 20:00, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:15, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:15, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:16, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:16, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:16, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:16, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reluctant delete - I can find lots of passing mentions in third party reliable sources but nothing that can said to be significant coverage. As people remarked in the first AfD, that's somewhat surprising for an organisation of this age, but it is what it is. Waggers TALK 12:25, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete 4 gnews hits despite existing for 100 years. Fails GNG. LibStar (talk) 01:37, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.