Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Kanpur (Lok Sabha constituency)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:29, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
South Kanpur (Lok Sabha constituency)[edit]
- South Kanpur (Lok Sabha constituency) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
South Kanpur (Lok Sabha constituency) is another unremarkable Page and there is not any Lok Sabha constituency named South Kanpur. Currently it is comes under Kanpur (Lok Sabha constituency). In this page creator mention that "South Kanpur Lok Sabha Constituencey will be finalized when it will become a district in 2014." I want to tell administrator that Lok Sabha seat would be increase in 2026 according to India constitution. currently 543 Lok Sabha constituency in India and it will steady till 2026.--Prateek Malviya (talk) 06:24, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 28 September 2013 (UTC) Note: Please consider reading WP:INDAFD which includes some points about WikiProject India AFDs. Those may or may not be applicable here. Tito☸Dutta 13:34, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Two year old hoax/activism article that has unfortunately been mirrored elsewhere. There has been a move/request to create a district but it hasn't received any official favor. Unfortunately Wikipedia seems to have been used in this activism! Kudos to the nominator for finding this hidden gem! —SpacemanSpiff 19:00, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.