Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South India's 75 Apostles of Bhakti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deletion unopposed. Sandstein 08:05, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

South India's 75 Apostles of Bhakti[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

"75 Apostles of Bhakti" seems to be a neologism by a wiki editor. Can not trace any RS pre-2005 (creation of article) using the term. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 07:06, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michig (talk) 08:01, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Borderline case of notability for WP:NEO. No great harm in deleting it because the subject is covered in individual pages for Alwar etc. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:22, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ⨹ 21:33, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.