Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Coast Express

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:03, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

South Coast Express[edit]

South Coast Express (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

2 year old article, orphan, no refs, hardly updated - suggest it really isn't going to happen. aycliffetalk 13:53, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:04, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:04, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete No sources that I can find. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:11, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I can't find any sources to indicate notability or prove that the plan even exists in the first place. Sarahj2107 (talk) 15:34, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Can't find anything to prove its notability, Fails GNG. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 15:38, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- at best it wreaks of WP:CRYSTAL. Without sources, I wonder whehter this is not mere wishful thinking or even WP:OR. I could find nothing relevant on Google. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:56, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.