Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South-Eastern Ukraine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:44, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

South-Eastern Ukraine[edit]

South-Eastern Ukraine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Why should we combine two completely different regions Southern Ukraine and Eastern Ukraine in one article? This is artificial. Shmurak (talk) 16:18, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because there's a political point to be made, perhaps? Delete as not notable, and probably falling foul of WP:POV. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:11, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:54, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:54, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete; article does not contain any referenced information that is not completely obvious and hence not notable.... ("South-Eastern Ukraine is comprising the Southern and Eastern parts of Ukraine"; so is South-Eastern Australia comprising the Southern and Eastern parts of Australia....) — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 22:27, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Original research. Carrite (talk) 13:16, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This is not original research. The equivalent article in Russian is much more expanded and this one can be expanded by translating. Also there is an existing article in the Ukrainian wiki, as well as in the Finnish wiki. There is no WP:SYNTH here, as this region encompasses all the regions with major Russian influence. Besides, there are lots of sources that widely mention the region, which can easily be found by doing a googlebooks search. --1l2l3k (talk) 00:56, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • 1l2l3k, even if this area encompasses all the regions with major Russian influence (I am not sure about this, especially about the words all and major), that would not mean that such region exist as separate cultural and historical macroregion. --Shmurak (talk) 08:12, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.