Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sounds from the Ground

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 10:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds from the Ground[edit]

no real notability shown. no indication albums are on important label. coverage in independent reliable sources does not appear to go beyond trivial. prod (and speedy) removed because of coverage found in google news, none of which appear to be non trivial. Duffbeerforme (talk) 13:13, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:MUSIC Niteshift36 (talk) 14:49, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:38, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I'm not gonna vote, cause I created the article like 4 years ago (casually at that). I don't really care if the article is deleted, but someone smacked a notice on my talk page so I'll comment on it. You can google SFTG and go to amazon, cdbaby, torrents, lastfm to get the music, and probably the curious could find plenty of cd/concert reviews. Seems sad to delete stubs on niche bands that've been around for quite a while now (not just this one) and have a small, albeit dedicated fanbase, just because they are not "all over the place" on the internet. Meanwhile there's a 2000-word article about the bulbasaur pokemon. But hey, it's wikipedia. Sick. Karol (talk) 20:24, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.