Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soundholic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:04, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Soundholic[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable record company - fails WP:CORP. Only G and Gnews hits do not contain significant coverage of the company, only mentions. ONLY claim to notability is one of inheritance through bands that have released songs via them. Codf1977 (talk) 18:26, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:01, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:32, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:32, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:32, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No sources to verify notability. --DAJF (talk) 22:55, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.