Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soundbites featured on The Jim Rome Show
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:13, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Soundbites featured on The Jim Rome Show[edit]
- Soundbites featured on The Jim Rome Show (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Almost completely unsourced list of non-notable fancruft. This is almost entirely original research. TNXMan 01:03, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Mass of trivia. No evidence that the topic itself is notable, even if individual jokes have sometimes been repeated in RS's. -Steve Dufour (talk) 01:48, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 02:30, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I created this page about three years ago in an attempt to break up the page List of content and features on The Jim Rome Show (since deleted) because that page was becoming extremely long. Since that page was deleted as being a list of trivia, I see no point in this page being here either. The show itself is obviously notable, but not every single little detail (or in this case, every soundbyte). Frank AnchorTalk 01:29, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as author has requested it. Handschuh-talk to me 02:44, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Not notable. I declined speedy, as the list of editors is quite large. Ronhjones (Talk) 01:39, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Agreed, the show is certainly notable, but this isn't. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 20:48, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.