Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sound Space Studios

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. no consensus for deletion after three weeks JForget 00:13, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sound Space Studios[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Richard Fury (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Non-notable recording studios. Spam piece. Only claim to fame is to have recorded a few bands' albums. No significant coverage but mere passing mentions in the sources. Creator is SPA with a certain COI problem. Christopher Connor (talk) 03:13, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

keep Unfair comment, the Sound Space Studios was well known and used in the Welsh music scene in the 1990's and shaped the sound of one of the most significant welsh rock albums of all time. There are other references to far less notable Cardiff record labels/studios in Wikipedia i.e: (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/See_Monkey_Do_Monkey) Richard Fury (talk)

WP:NOTINHERITED, WP:OTHERSTUFF. Can I also ask whether if you have a personal interest in the subject? It's generally encouraged to disclose this if you do. Christopher Connor (talk) 06:27, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Article lacks any indication or claim of notability. A recording studio that records music. Yay. Cindamuse (talk) 14:24, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the Manic Street Preachers are pretty damn famous so their recording studio seems worthy of a Wikipedia article. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 19:01, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is not inherited. They have to be notable in their own right, not through their association with some other group. Just because some group used some facility somewhere, doesn't automatically make that facility notable. Christopher Connor (talk) 06:27, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:46, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:46, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:29, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:18, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.